Current:Home > InvestOptions Trading Strategies: Classification by Strike Prices - Insights by Bertram Charlton -Zenith Money Vision
Options Trading Strategies: Classification by Strike Prices - Insights by Bertram Charlton
View
Date:2025-04-18 10:12:36
Options by strike price classification
When comparing the strike price to the current stock price, there are two scenarios: higher than the current stock price (Covered) and lower than the current stock price (Naked). So, options with different strike prices can be classified into 8 types:
Long Covered Call
Buying a call option with a strike price > stock price.
Long Naked Call
Buying a call option with a strike price < stock price.
Sell Covered Call
Selling a call option with a strike price > stock price.
Sell Naked Call
Selling a call option with a strike price < stock price.
Long Covered Put
Buying a put option with a strike price > stock price.
Long Naked Put
Buying a put option with a strike price < stock price.
Sell Covered Put
Selling a put option with a strike price > stock price.
Sell Naked Put
Selling a put option with a strike price < stock price.
The reason for this classification is that the significance behind whether the strike price is higher (Covered) or lower (Naked) than the stock price is very different.
Long Naked Call
Let’s take Long Naked Call (buying a call option with a strike price < stock price) as an example. I believe Long Naked Call is essentially like adding extra leverage to buying a stock.
For example, let’s say a stock is priced at $100, and you buy a call option with a strike price of $50. Since the strike price is $50 and the stock price is $100, the strike price < stock price, making this a Long Naked Call. Because the option’s strike price is $50 less than the stock price, the premium for this option won’t be cheap; it will definitely be above $50. If the premium were less than $50, your cost to exercise (strike price + premium) would be less than the stock price, which wouldn’t make sense for the counterparty. For someone to be willing to trade with you, the premium must be higher than $50.
Let’s assume the premium is $60. So, the cost to buy this option is $60. In this case:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, your profit is $40, and the return is 40/60 = +67%.
If the stock drops 50% to $50, your loss is $60, and the return is -60/60 = -100%.
Now, if you bought the stock instead of the option:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, your profit is $50, and the return is 50/100 = +50%.
If the stock drops 50% to $50, your loss is $50, and the return is -50/100 = -50%.
As you can see, compared to directly buying the stock, your return with the option is almost like having double leverage. But it’s not exactly double leverage because the premium has a time value, which means you paid an extra cost.
Long Covered Call
The significance behind a Long Covered Call is quite different.
For example, if a stock is priced at $100, and you buy a call option with a strike price of $110, this is a Long Covered Call because the strike price > stock price. The premium for this option won’t be as high as in the previous example. Let’s assume it’s $10.
So, if you buy this option for $10:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, because the strike price + premium will be greater than the stock price and the strike price is fixed at $110, the premium will rise to at least $40. The return is (150-110-10)/10 = +300%.
If the stock rises 20% to $120, your return is (120-110-10)/10 = 0%.
If the stock rises 10% to $110, your return is (110-110-10)/10 = -100%.
In fact, since your strike price is $110, unless the stock rises more than 10%, your return is -100%.
As you can see, the leverage effect of a Long Covered Call is very different from that of a Long Naked Call.
veryGood! (3684)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Oklahoma State RB Ollie Gordon II arrested on accusations of DUI, per reports
- What's a personality hire? Here's the value they bring to the workplace.
- New Sherri Papini documentary will showcase infamous kidnapping hoax 'in her own words'
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Suki Waterhouse Reveals Whether She and Robert Pattinson Planned Pregnancy
- Melting of Alaska’s Juneau icefield accelerates, losing snow nearly 5 times faster than in the 1980s
- Texas to double $5 billion state fund aimed at expanding the power grid
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Stripper, adult establishments sue Florida over new age restriction
Ranking
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Biden administration proposes rule to protect workers from extreme heat
- Wimbledon 2024: Day 2 order of play, how to watch Djokovic, Swiatek
- Arby's brings back potato cakes for first time since 2021
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Fed Chair Jerome Powell: US inflation is slowing again, though it isn’t yet time to cut rates
- Biden administration proposes rule to protect workers from extreme heat
- Biden to give extended interview to ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos on Friday
Recommendation
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
Supreme Court kicks gun cases back to lower courts for new look after Second Amendment ruling
Proof Margot Robbie and Tom Ackerley's Romance Is Worthy of an Award
Stock market today: Asian shares are mixed after gains on Wall Street
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
Melting of Alaska’s Juneau icefield accelerates, losing snow nearly 5 times faster than in the 1980s
Gregg Berhalter faces mounting pressure after USMNT's Copa America exit
Attorneys face deadline to wrap Jan. 6 prosecutions. That could slide if Trump wins